Jejima Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 Just watched the latest (and last?) Star Wars installment. I liked it! Better than I and II IMO. Bad news: Jar Jar Binks is in it :( Good news: But in a non-speaking role :) Very Good news: Chewbacca makes a cameo ;)
Sasanishiki Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 I was having this discussion with friends the other day. I honestly can't remember what happened in II. I remember a worm or robot thing that went through a window and tried to assassinate someone, but apart from that a lot of it is a blank. Was II the one with Yoda doing the sabre fighting? And was it the one where the Sith first appears with the double-ended lightsabre? Please give me a plot rundown so that I'm informed!!
Jejima Posted May 19, 2005 Author Posted May 19, 2005 Hmmmm, I can't remember much of II either..... except it has the soppy love story between Anakin and Padma. It does have Yoda diong his thing with the light sabre. I think the double-headed one is from I with Darth Maul (III arguably goes one (or two!) better at one stage in regards to light sabres). Also in II there is the origin of the clone army and the senate starts to get extreme powers. Hope this helps.... ;-)
Zentoryu Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 George Lucas definitly stepped up his game for this film, after making me think he had lost his mind with the last two. Yes, Yoda's lightsaber duel with Darth Tyranus (or whatever his name was) took place during II. II's main storyline was the corny love affair between Anakin and Padme, as well as the beginning of Anakin's long slow turn towards the dark side (his mother being murdered and all). It also saw the beginning of the extermination of the Jedi and the creation of the clone army to combat the seperatists, sowing the seeds for Chancellor Palpatine to take control of the senate and begin his own journey towards becoming Emperor. I just watched this a couple of weeks ago on DVD, that's the only reason I remember any of it. It was that forgettable. ;-)
sekihiryu Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 World release dates France 15 May 2005 (Cannes Film Festival) (premiere) Argentina 16 May 2005 (Buenos Aires) (premiere) UK 16 May 2005 (London) (premiere) Kuwait 17 May 2005 Austria 18 May 2005 Bahrain 18 May 2005 Belgium 18 May 2005 Egypt 18 May 2005 France 18 May 2005 Netherlands 18 May 2005 Switzerland 18 May 2005 (French speaking region) Argentina 19 May 2005 Australia 19 May 2005 Brazil 19 May 2005 Bulgaria 19 May 2005 Canada 19 May 2005 Chile 19 May 2005 China 19 May 2005 Colombia 19 May 2005 Costa Rica 19 May 2005 Croatia 19 May 2005 Czech Republic 19 May 2005 Denmark 19 May 2005 Dominican Republic 19 May 2005 El Salvador 19 May 2005 Finland 19 May 2005 Germany 19 May 2005 Guatemala 19 May 2005 Honduras 19 May 2005 Hong Kong 19 May 2005 Hungary 19 May 2005 Israel 19 May 2005 Mexico 19 May 2005 New Zealand 19 May 2005 Norway 19 May 2005 Peru 19 May 2005 Philippines 19 May 2005 Poland 19 May 2005 Portugal 19 May 2005 Russia 19 May 2005 Singapore 19 May 2005 Slovenia 19 May 2005 Spain 19 May 2005 Sweden 19 May 2005 Switzerland 19 May 2005 (German speaking region) Thailand 19 May 2005 Turkey 19 May 2005 UK 19 May 2005 USA 19 May 2005 United Arab Emirates 19 May 2005 Ecuador 20 May 2005 Estonia 20 May 2005 Greece 20 May 2005 Iceland 20 May 2005 India 20 May 2005 Italy 20 May 2005 Lithuania 20 May 2005 Switzerland 20 May 2005 (Italian speaking region) Taiwan 21 May 2005 Japan 9 July 2005 July 9th!!!!!. Japan is the worlds worst place to watch movies, it is the last place in the world to get many new releases and it is the most expensive place to buy ticket. ;-) ;-) it sucks to be film buff here.
Sasanishiki Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 I saw Episode I in Japan, and the saving grace was that there were Japanese subtitles so I knew what the hell Jar jar Binks was trying to say!!! ;-)
Elenrian Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 I France, the Episode I came out about 3 or 4 months after the USA release! Now we're more lucky!!! Perhaps thet wanted to be forgiven for that horrible wait... I am going to see Episode III, and I'll tell you what I think about it soon!
Sasanishiki Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 Even though you've given me a plot run down of II, I still can't recall any of it. It must have been forgettable!
Elenrian Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 The Episode II is very bad. It is normal that you don't remember it! Anakin's mother dies in this film... And he makes some nightmares. But Hayden Christensen plays too bad!
Kasugaran Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 All you need to know from II is that it turns out that all the stormtroopers are Kiwis! Also, Boba Fett is a Kiwi too. I am getting all patriotic just thinking that our boys are there defending the empire from those damn rebels!
brewdude Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 Japan 9 July 2005 July 9th!!!!!. Japan is the worlds worst place to watch movies, it is the last place in the world to get many new releases and it is the most expensive place to buy ticket. :-| (Laughing...) it sucks to be film buff here. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Dude, I fully agree.....a load of horse dodo if you ask me. Ridley Scott managed to get his "Kingdom of Heaven" out here with in a couple weeks of the U.S. release date. This 2 month delay is crap. Then when the darn thing gets here they totally screw up the subtitles. Should have heard the uproar over LOTR. Japanese fans were ready to lynch the lady who was the translator
Kishinoyama Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 I will see it maybe when it is on DVD. I have not watched the first two "pre-quels". I actually watched the original Star Wars at a Drive-in movie theater. I eventually watched the other two movies that followed. Not much enthusiam on my part for the "pre-quels". (Laughing...)
Kaihayaiha Posted May 20, 2005 Posted May 20, 2005 We had over 1600 people at my theater last night to see the 5/18 midnight showing (technically 5/19)... had it playing in seven auditoriums. About 40 punks tried to jump in front of the line and force their way in at about 11:00 and delayed the beginning of seating. I got to work at 5:30 PM and there was already a line outside so some of those people had been waiting for over 5 hours... they were understandably not happy to hear that a group of newcomers was trying to jump in front. I am scheduled to be the projectionist tomorrow and all I have to do is keep the movies running unlike that night when I was in charge of concessions.
Elenrian Posted May 21, 2005 Posted May 21, 2005 (edited) I have seen it. I will sum up my reaction. Wow. Great. Fantastic. BUT, there is something wrong with Padm Edited May 21, 2005 by Elenrian
Jejima Posted May 21, 2005 Author Posted May 21, 2005 Spoiler follows:---- Why exactly did C3PO need to have his memory circuits erased? Just so that at the start of IV it makes sense when he seems to know nothing about anything? In which case, why doesn't R2D2 - who doesn't get his memory erased - bring him up to speed? ...but I like R2D2 at the start of III B-)
Elenrian Posted May 21, 2005 Posted May 21, 2005 For the golden one, I think you got the explanation. If it had not been done, there would have been a inconsistency with the next story... R2D2, I don't know, but I think it hasn't much memory, so it may be erased often...
Cammy Posted May 21, 2005 Posted May 21, 2005 (edited) I went and saw it opening night...me and my friends drove an hour to go see it(went to a better theater)...the movie was amazing...it really made up for episode I and II. I wish that Jar Jar would of gotten killed...but can't get everything that you want to happen. I haven't watched episode I in forever but there it talks about Anakin, if i am not mistaken i believe that he doesn't have a father that his mom just ended up being pregnant...because of the metacloriens(spelling)...that is why he is the "chosen one"...i think that is right if i am wrong...sorry. *SPOILER*(nothing big, but if you haven't seen it and don't want to know anything don't read...coulnd't get white text to work...sorry) I believe that at the end of the episode III they say erase both droids memory...not just C3PO. Edited May 21, 2005 by Cammy
Jejima Posted May 22, 2005 Author Posted May 22, 2005 *SPOILER*(nothing big, but if you haven't seen it and don't want to know anything don't read...coulnd't get white text to work...sorry) I didn't nk9ow how to do it either until I 'replied' to Elenrian and discovered the secret of **
Jejima Posted May 22, 2005 Author Posted May 22, 2005 Spoiler:- I believe that at the end of the episode III they say erase both droids memory...not just C3PO. I remembered it a little differently. Someone says something like: "and erase that one's memory circuits" pointing at C3PO. C3PO looks shocked, and then R2D2 makes beepy noises that sound like it's laughing....
Jejima Posted May 22, 2005 Author Posted May 22, 2005 Spoiler Question for those who have already watched III:--- Why exactly did Yoda have to go to the planet of the Wookies? Except to give Chewbacca his cameo, of course.... But what was the reason given in the plot?
Elenrian Posted May 22, 2005 Posted May 22, 2005 I haven't watched episode I in forever but there it talks about Anakin, if i am not mistaken i believe that he doesn't have a father that his mom just ended up being pregnant...because of the metacloriens(spelling)...that is why he is the "chosen one"...i think that is right if i am wrong...sorry. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Spoiler or personnal analysis--- I think Dark Plagueis is his father... To my mind, Palpatine was Plagueis appretice and killed him... There is my idea, but why not? (Pulling hair...) If he was the chosen one, he would have killed the siths, including Palpatine. Of course he is the One, because he kills the Emperor at the end of Episode VI. It is called "the return of the Jedi", because Anakin is back, and NOT Luke! Am I wrong? (Laughing...) Answer to Jejima Because the planet was said to be "strategic"... In fact, Chewbacca had to be in this movie, so they found a good idea to put him there... (Sigh...)
Jesinofuji Posted May 22, 2005 Posted May 22, 2005 (edited) I liked this movie. It was definitely the best of the new ones. Its worth the price of the ticket for sure. What really makes this movie is the litesaber battles. EP1 was a disgrace. I liked EP2. I know I'm in the minority. I liked EP2s action scenes, and the story was not bad. But EP3 blows the other two away hands down. Edited May 22, 2005 by Jesinofuji
Naifuzan Posted May 22, 2005 Posted May 22, 2005 I watched it today. I found pieces of it to be pretty boring, and some pieces to be extremely silly. I guess it was an ok movie. Sums up the series nicely.
sekihiryu Posted June 25, 2005 Posted June 25, 2005 Finally saw it today at a special preview - still 2 weeks until the Japan opening!!!Overall pretty disappointing - the movie lacks soul for a lack of another word. Hayden Christensens performance was abysmal, wooden and flat, he was not a credible Anakin. The whole movie was based around him and his journey but his journey was quick and easy with not much inner torment - a real actor was needed to bring out Anakin and Darth Vader, Christianson failed and that ultimately causes the movie to stutter along. Natalie Portman was mediocre in her role, not helped by the poor chemistry between her and Christensen. Grievous was underused, a mere accidental bystander swept into the movie, who was he?. Christopher Lee got virtually no screen time. Chewbacca made a token appearance what for? for the rabid old school fans? it was pointless to the direction of the movie A lot of pointless visual extravaganza like the opening sequence that didn't help the overall plot and direction of the movie, just self serving ostentatiousness. Yes George we know you and you little team at ILM can create some phenomenal graphics but associate it, connect it with the overall direction and spirit of the movie. Movies are about good acting and logical flow and good plots with "chemistry" between the lead actors. This movie has too much chopping and changing, snippets of scenes that barely set up the movie abound, it felt the whole movie was going through the motions, the tension build up was missing in action and the final transformation into the suited Vader was hollow and anti-climatic. Movies were the supporting actors Ian McDiarmid and Ewan McGregor completely outshine and dominate the supposed lead are unsatisfying. The former two are the only two actors in the whole movie the gave a decent performance. Samuel L Jackson is not a jedi, he has been terribly miscast in all three films. Things change, in the 70's and 80's Michael Jackson used to make good music and George Lucas used to make good movies. Things change... George is one from four, a mere 25% in directing StarWars movies 1,2,3, were weak only 4 was great and and seems in retrospect a directing fluke. 5 and 6 the best two in my book were directed by other people. Perhaps he should have taken a back seat and let a real director handle things
Asysanyama Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 Finally saw it today at a special preview - still 2 weeks until the Japan opening!!!Overall pretty disappointing - the movie lacks soul for a lack of another word. Hayden Christensens performance was abysmal, wooden and flat, he was not a credible Anakin. The whole movie was based around him and his journey but his journey was quick and easy with not much inner torment - a real actor was needed to bring out Anakin and Darth Vader, Christianson failed and that ultimately causes the movie to stutter along. Natalie Portman was mediocre in her role, not helped by the poor chemistry between her and Christensen. Grievous was underused, a mere accidental bystander swept into the movie, who was he?. Christopher Lee got virtually no screen time. Chewbacca made a token appearance what for? for the rabid old school fans? it was pointless to the direction of the movie A lot of pointless visual extravaganza like the opening sequence that didn't help the overall plot and direction of the movie, just self serving ostentatiousness. Yes George we know you and you little team at ILM can create some phenomenal graphics but associate it, connect it with the overall direction and spirit of the movie. Movies are about good acting and logical flow and good plots with "chemistry" between the lead actors. This movie has too much chopping and changing, snippets of scenes that barely set up the movie abound, it felt the whole movie was going through the motions, the tension build up was missing in action and the final transformation into the suited Vader was hollow and anti-climatic. Movies were the supporting actors Ian McDiarmid and Ewan McGregor completely outshine and dominate the supposed lead are unsatisfying. The former two are the only two actors in the whole movie the gave a decent performance. Samuel L Jackson is not a jedi, he has been terribly miscast in all three films. Things change, in the 70's and 80's Michael Jackson used to make good music and George Lucas used to make good movies. Things change... George is one from four, a mere 25% in directing StarWars movies 1,2,3, were weak only 4 was great and and seems in retrospect a directing fluke. 5 and 6 the best two in my book were directed by other people. Perhaps he should have taken a back seat and let a real director handle things <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agree 101% with you. Specially about Hayden Christensens, and the lack of... let's say... MAGIC ?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now