Rocks Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 13 minutes ago, Nantonoyama said: The fact that he finished kyujo is not supposed to change anything in the making of the banzuke. Of the fights he did, he was 9-3, which is really impressive... why would it worth less than a 9-6? It isn't supposed to but will I think. Why promote a guy likely to miss half his matches when you don't have to? If he had finished well ahead of the guys ahead of him I could see it but Daieisho has just 1 less win and is 2 ranks above Osunaarashi. Even straight up there's an argument for Daieisho over Osunaarashi. Given Osunaarashi has also missed all of winter jungyo I think he has little chance of being promoted. They'll leave him in Juryo where he'll have easier opponents he can heal up against.
Rocks Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I think I've cracked the code. They simply feed this into a punched card reader and whatever it spits out is the next banzuke Makuuchi Banzuke Result East Hoshitori Rank West Hoshitori Result 11-4 Harumafuji Y Kakuryu 14-1 Y 11-4 Hakuho Y 9-6 Goeido O Kisenosato 12-3 J 5-10 Kotoshogiku O Terunofuji 8-7 7-8 Takayasu S Okinoumi 5-10 6-9 Mitakeumi K Tamawashi 10-5 G 6-9 Tochiozan M1 Aoiyama 4-11 3-12 Kaisei M2 Yoshikaze 6-9 7-8 Endo M3 Shodai 11-4 K 6-9 Kotoyuki M4 Chiyonokuni 5-10 8-7 Shohozan M5 Takarafuji 9-6 4-11 Nishikigi M6 Tochinoshin 10-5 9-6 Takekaze M7 Takanoiwa 6-9 3-12 Sadanoumi M8 Ikioi 10-5 8-7 Myogiryu M9 Kagayaki 6-9 9-6 Chiyoshoma M10 Arawashi 11-4 3-12 Kyokushuho M11 Hokutofuji 9-6 7-8 Daishomaru M12 Chiyootori 6-9 4-11 Hidenoumi M13 Ichinojo 7-8 9-6 Sokokurai M14 Chiyotairyu 7-8 10-5 K Ishiura M15 Toyohibiki 6-9 8-7 Gagamaru M16 1
Nantonoyama Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 18 hours ago, Rocks said: It isn't supposed to but will I think. Why promote a guy likely to miss half his matches when you don't have to? If he had finished well ahead of the guys ahead of him I could see it but Daieisho has just 1 less win and is 2 ranks above Osunaarashi. Even straight up there's an argument for Daieisho over Osunaarashi. Given Osunaarashi has also missed all of winter jungyo I think he has little chance of being promoted. They'll leave him in Juryo where he'll have easier opponents he can heal up against. If Osunaarashi goes kyujo 0-0-15 in january, the fact that he is ranked M16e or J1e will matter. In M16e he will end up in lower Juryo in march, whereas in J1e he *could* end up in makushita. That is why it is not possible to rely only on the fact that "there will be a makuuchi rikishi that goes kyujo, and therefore less makuuchi matches to broadcast". For the ranks yeah, but one has to remember that 8 wins is only .5 above the par (7.5) whist 9 wins is 1.5 above par. And the anouncement of "official" kyujo rikishi for the jungyo is done after the establishment of the banzuke, which is done in the week after the tournament has ended So in the end I think that Osunaarashi will be promoted, but I agree on the fact that Daieisho has a chance to be promoted too (lets says it is 60/40%), and if that occurs it would not be scandalous
Asashosakari Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 (edited) So, how did everyone solve the maegashira-joi ranks? No matter which way one goes, some rikishi will have to be somewhat out of place. My attempt: Takarafuji (M5w 9-6) M1 Arawashi (M10w 11-4)Ikioi (M8w 10-5) M2 Mitakeumi (Ke 6-9)Takekaze (M7e 9-6) M3 Shohozan (M5e 8-7)Okinoumi (Sw 5-10) M4 Endo (M3e 7-8)Tochiozan (M1e 6-9) M5 Yoshikaze (M2w 6-9) Takarafuji's fairly clear (unless Tochinoshin got Tochinoshinned, I guess), and Yoshikaze should be correct as well, but with the rest I don't feel comfortable at all. Alternative ideas that made it into your GTB entries? Edit: Ah, one more question - how high did you promote Chiyoo? Only M15w for me... (And because it's already being discussed: I went with Osunaarashi over Daieisho.) Edited December 21, 2016 by Asashosakari
Asojima Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 36 minutes ago, Asashosakari said: Edit: Ah, one more question - how high did you promote Chiyoo? Only M15w for me... (And because it's already being discussed: I went with Osunaarashi over Daieisho.) I said the hell with it, overpromoted Chiyoo to 12e and underdemoted Kyokushuho to 16e. That is why I am always ranked near the bottom in GTB. 1
Rocks Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 (edited) Yes, this was my first time but the top of maegashira seemed particularly tough. Mine: Takarafuji M1 Shohozan Mitakeumi M2 Okinoumi Ikioi M3 Takekaze Tochiozan M4 Arawashi Endo M5 Yoshikaze I have Chiyoo at M13w. Oh, and I have Daiesho over Osunaarashi. Edited December 21, 2016 by Rocks
Nantonoyama Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Takarafuji (M5w 9-6) M1 Mitakeumi (Ke 6-9)Ikioi (M8w 10-5) M2 Arawashi (M10w 11-4)Shohozan (M5e 8-7) M3 Takekaze (M7e 9-6)Endo (M3e 7-8) M4 Tochiozan (M1e 6-9)Okinoumi (Sw 5-10) M5 Yoshikaze (M2w 6-9) YThis is my guess for the top5 makuuchi. Aside from Takarafuji and Yoshikaze, I am not very confident with this. In my banzuke, Chiyoo comes in M15e spot, it is already quite an interesting overpromotion for him...
Akinomaki Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 (edited) On 20.12.2016 at 19:34, Nantonoyama said: The fact that he finished kyujo is not supposed to change anything in the making of the banzuke. Of the fights he did, he was 9-3, which is really impressive... why would it worth less than a 9-6? It is worth 3 fights less - a 9-6 has done them and should get treated better. Edited December 21, 2016 by Akinomaki
chishafuwaku Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Takarafuji M1 Mitakeumi Ikioi M2 Arawashi Tochiozan M3 Okinoumi Endo M4 Shohozan Takekaze M5 Yoshikaze Sadanoumi M15 Chiyoo Osunaarashi M16 chishafuwaku
Ryoshishokunin Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 1 Takarafuji Ikioi 2 Mitakeumi Arawashi 3 Tochiozan Shohozan 4 Endo Takekaze 5 Okinoumi Chiyoshoma Not at all happy with the above. Everyone wants to be at M4.. 15 Chiyotairyu Chiyoo 16 Osunaarashi ..which also answers the question of where i put Chiyoo. I don't envy the torikumi makers the Chiyonomess that is the bottom of the Maegashira ranks.
Andonishiki Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 took one night and another morning to finally produce this.... Takarafuji M1 Arawashi Ikioi M2 Mitakeumi Takekaze M3 Okinoumi Shohozan M4 Tochiozan Endo M5 Yoshikaze M13w Chiyoo... probably too high Chiyotairyu M15 Osunaarashi Sadanoumi M16 Daieisho J1 Ura hoping for 60 points (35 /25 bullseye /10 hits)
kuroimori Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Takarafuji M1 Arawashi Ikioi M2 Mitakeumi Shohozan M3 Tochiozan Endo M4 Okinoumi Take K M5 Yoshi K Chiyoo at M13w
Rocks Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 7 hours ago, Ryoshishokunin said: ..which also answers the question of where i put Chiyoo. I don't envy the torikumi makers the Chiyonomess that is the bottom of the Maegashira ranks. Yeah, this is getting crazy. There will be 5 from Kokonoe-beya in makuuchi in January and Chiyomaru is waiting in the wings. That's a lot of bouts to schedule so they don't meet.
rhyen Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 Well, they probably had a dry run last year with 4 isegahama rikishi in the joi-jin.
Jakusotsu Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 FWIW: Takarafuji (M5w 9-6) 1 Mitakeumi (K1e 6-9) Arawashi (M10w 11-4) 2 Ikioi (M8w 10-5) Takekaze (M7e 9-6) 3 Shohozan (M5e 8-7) Okinoumi (S1w 5-10) 4 Tochiozan (M1e 6-9) Endo (M3e 7-8) 5 Yoshikaze (M2w 6-9)
Ryoshishokunin Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 ...I just discovered a typo in my spreadsheet for GTB, which explains why everyone else has Yoshikaze ranked higher than I do. *sigh*. 4 wins and 6 wins are not the same.
Pandaazuma Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 Maegashira E: Takarafuji M5w (9-6) Maegashira W: Arawashi M10w (11-4) Maegashira E2: Mitakeumi K1e (6-9) Maegashira W2: Ikioi M8w (10-5) Maegashira E3: Takekaze M7e (9-6) Maegashira W3: Okinoumi S1w (5-10) Maegashira E4: Shohozan M5e (8-7) Maegashira W4: Tochiozan M1e (6-9) Maegashira E5: Endo M3e (7-8) Maegashira W5: Yoshikaze M2w (6-9) I don't like the Endo-Tochiozan thing! :( I put Chiyoo at M14W. And I went with Daieisho as they definitely have it in for Osuna and anything close is likely to go against him. Unless, of course, they've decided he is out of the dog house.
Ganzohnesushi Posted December 23, 2016 Posted December 23, 2016 Maegashira E: Takarafuji M5w (9-6) Maegashira W: Arawashi M10w (11-4) Maegashira E2: Ikioi M8w (10-5) Maegashira W2: Takekaze M7e (9-6) Maegashira E3: Mitakeumi K1e (6-9) Maegashira W3: Okinoumi S1w (5-10) Maegashira E4: Shohozan M5e (8-7) Maegashira W4: Tochiozan M1e (6-9) Maegashira E5: Endo M3e (7-8) Maegashira W5: Yoshikaze M2w (6-9) Seems I'm the only one who demoted Mitakeumi all the way down to M3e. I put Chiyoo at M13w and of course I promoted Osunaarashi. Ganzohnesushi
Gurowake Posted December 23, 2016 Posted December 23, 2016 Maegashira E: Takarafuji M5w (9-6) Maegashira W: Mitakeumi K1e (6-9) Maegashira E2: Okinoumi S1w (5-10) Maegashira W2: Arawashi M10w (11-4) Maegashira E3: Ikioi M8w (10-5) Maegashira W3: Tochiozan M1e (6-9) Maegashira E4: Endo M3e (7-8) Maegashira W4: Shohozan M5e (8-7) Maegashira E5: Takekaze M7e (9-6) Maegashira W5: Yoshikaze M2w (6-9) I have my methods. I doubt I'm at all right though. Chiyooooo at M13w. Daieisho gets the very last spot.
Suwihuto Posted December 23, 2016 Posted December 23, 2016 Takarafuji M1 Ikioi Arawashi M2 Mitakeumi Shohozan M3 Takekaze Tochiozan M4 Endo Okinoumi M5 Yoshikaze Chiyoo at M13w like a few others, Osuna at M15w.
Sakura Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 This is only my second try and I know this looks absurd. I'm still learning the rules of promotion/demotion and it will take me a few basho to get the general idea. Takarafuji M1 Shohozan Mitakeumi M2 Ikioi Tochiozan M3 Okinoumi Endo M4 Yoshikaze Arawashi M5 Takekaze Anyway Chiyoo at M13w and no Osu.
Feginowaka Posted December 25, 2016 Posted December 25, 2016 12 points @ M1-M5 ... and 0 points @M16 (Daieisho instead of Osuna) ...but overall is ok: 62
Sakura Posted December 25, 2016 Posted December 25, 2016 No time to calculate my score, but it won't be good. The frustrating thing is that is was half a rank off in so many cases, still netting me 0 points for all of them.
Rocks Posted December 25, 2016 Posted December 25, 2016 Really disappointing. I think I got a 33. I would have taken anything over 40 and have been glad. I was 1 rank too high or low all over the place.
Ganzohnesushi Posted December 25, 2016 Posted December 25, 2016 Annihilating. Only 40 points is really dreadful Ganzohnesushi
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now