Rocks 1,672 Posted November 28, 2016 13 hours ago, Sakura said: It works just using S. Thank you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asashosakari 16,472 Posted December 26, 2016 According to the new banzuke topics and backed up by his ja.wiki article, ozeki Kotogahama did not move from Nishonoseki-beya to Sadogatake-beya when the latter was opened in 1955.09 (as the DB currently indicates), but only did so from 1958.11. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doitsuyama 1,139 Posted December 26, 2016 9 hours ago, Asashosakari said: According to the new banzuke topics and backed up by his ja.wiki article, ozeki Kotogahama did not move from Nishonoseki-beya to Sadogatake-beya when the latter was opened in 1955.09 (as the DB currently indicates), but only did so from 1958.11. Fixed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orandashoho 718 Posted January 3, 2017 The sumo database is very slow today. Does anyone else have this problem? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asojima 2,833 Posted January 3, 2017 9 minutes ago, orandashoho said: The sumo database is very slow today. Does anyone else have this problem? No problem here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orandashoho 718 Posted January 3, 2017 It has become faster now. I guess it was just a glut on the line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bumpkin 438 Posted January 14, 2017 7 minutes ago, John Gunning said: Sumo reference shows a 3-1 Mitakeumi lead over Terunofuji but they've only met three times http://sumodb.sumogames.de/Rikishi_opp.aspx?r=12210&r2=11927 If Terunofuji beats Mitakeumi later today than it's all good! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asashosakari 16,472 Posted January 14, 2017 43 minutes ago, John Gunning said: Sumo reference shows a 3-1 Mitakeumi lead over Terunofuji but they've only met three times http://sumodb.sumogames.de/Rikishi_opp.aspx?r=12210&r2=11927 Part of the global (and still existing) issue I mentioned here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asashosakari 16,472 Posted January 19, 2017 A couple of yasumi-related problems still persist in the Aki 2016 results, namely with Miura (should be 1-1-5) and Daishoko (should be 3-3-1). A quick look around for similar issues also brought up a couple of cases from the 1980s, namely Tochiizumi 1986.05, and Maenoarashi and Oishida both 1987.05. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muhomatsu 120 Posted January 30, 2017 Found an issue with the Kabu. Take a look at the current list and you will note that Tatsunami Ichimon still exists as the Ichimon name. Should it not now be Isegahama ichimon, especially since Tatsunami is now part of Takanohana Ichimon? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PawnSums 59 Posted February 10, 2017 no yusho portrait for Nagoya 2009 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doitsuyama 1,139 Posted February 13, 2017 On 10.2.2017 at 23:04, PawnSums said: no yusho portrait for Nagoya 2009 Well, if you can give me a picture, I will add it. Seems not to be available in the mainichi shop now, but maybe it's to be found somewhere else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PawnSums 59 Posted February 13, 2017 6 hours ago, Doitsuyama said: Well, if you can give me a picture, I will add it. Seems not to be available in the mainichi shop now, but maybe it's to be found somewhere else. I have a very small picture, on an unrelated note (but still about sumo pictures) I do have a picture for Minanogawa Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PawnSums 59 Posted February 17, 2017 Raiden's Real Name is listed as #, but on Wikipedia he is Seki Tarokichi. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PawnSums 59 Posted February 17, 2017 For Kyushu 1974, Takanohana I And Wakamisugi have Jun-Yusho While Kitanoumi Has Yusho-Doten 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doitsuyama 1,139 Posted March 5, 2017 On 17.2.2017 at 15:30, PawnSums said: For Kyushu 1974, Takanohana I And Wakamisugi have Jun-Yusho While Kitanoumi Has Yusho-Doten Well spotted, I corrected this now. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asashosakari 16,472 Posted March 11, 2017 This is an odd one. Back in 1978.03, tsukedashi starter Makino is listed as having lost to himself on Day 3. Apparently the winner of that bout was the other tsukedashi Nagaoka who is currently missing his match for that day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rocks 1,672 Posted March 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, Asashosakari said: This is an odd one. Back in 1978.03, tsukedashi starter Makino is listed as having lost to himself on Day 3. Apparently the winner of that bout was the other tsukedashi Nagaoka who is currently missing his match for that day. Yes, but he also beat himself so it equals out. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doitsuyama 1,139 Posted March 24, 2017 On 11.3.2017 at 17:06, Asashosakari said: This is an odd one. Back in 1978.03, tsukedashi starter Makino is listed as having lost to himself on Day 3. Apparently the winner of that bout was the other tsukedashi Nagaoka who is currently missing his match for that day. Must have been a bug in my Excel script which generated the bouts from the torikumi tables... thanks as usual for catching the error, should be corrected now. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katooshu 2,016 Posted March 27, 2017 The all yusho winners page lists Toyohibiki as having won his first juryo yusho, but it is his third. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PawnSums 59 Posted March 28, 2017 (edited) On 3/27/2017 at 03:34, Katooshu said: The all yusho winners page lists Toyohibiki as having won his first juryo yusho, but it is his third. beat me to it. EDIT: it also says it on the basho page and on his profile if you scroll down. Edited March 28, 2017 by PawnSums Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asashosakari 16,472 Posted March 29, 2017 I hate to nag, but a number of problems continue to persist: Records corrupted in Aki 2016, with the affected H2H counts further compromised since then http://www.sumoforum.net/forums/topic/12746-sumo-reference-updates/?do=findComment&comment=318401 Wrong rikishi marked as jun-yusho in 1940.05 http://www.sumoforum.net/forums/topic/12746-sumo-reference-updates/?do=findComment&comment=320182 Old records missing yasumi counts http://www.sumoforum.net/forums/topic/12746-sumo-reference-updates/?do=findComment&comment=325310 In addition, both Hatsu and Haru have the query issue with zero-loss and zero-win rikishi again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PawnSums 59 Posted April 3, 2017 Sumo Reference keeps going on and Off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doitsuyama 1,139 Posted April 6, 2017 On 19.1.2017 at 06:45, Asashosakari said: A couple of yasumi-related problems still persist in the Aki 2016 results, namely with Miura (should be 1-1-5) and Daishoko (should be 3-3-1). A quick look around for similar issues also brought up a couple of cases from the 1980s, namely Tochiizumi 1986.05, and Maenoarashi and Oishida both 1987.05. Sorry for missing this contribution. Corrected, and those should actually already be all such cases. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doitsuyama 1,139 Posted April 6, 2017 On 12.11.2016 at 18:47, Asashosakari said: Related report elsewhere: As far as I can tell, both head-to-heads were corrupted on Day 11 in Aki basho, and spot-checking a few more bouts from that day, I think they're all wrong. Not all, but it certainly was some work to correct them. Should be ok now... 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
